Written a few days after England won the UEFA Women’s Euros, this blog follows closely on the publication of our recent post, marking the 10 year anniversary of the London Olympics and Paralympics. It expands on some of the same themes, in particular, the difficult relationship between elite sport, PE and youth participation.
This article, published on the 10th anniversary of London 2012, asks questions about the way we treat mega sport events and elite athletes. At the end is a link to access a free resource that will prompt thinking and conversation about how we can do better at inspiring far more young people.
“Play, positive experiences and affirming who we are at our core, are the actual ingredients of achieving lasting change” `
(Segar, 2022 p4)
This blog is intended to support current and aspiring subject leaders to consider how to embark on transformational change, ensuring that you deliver on your goals. Click the link here or at the end to receive our FREE support material to get you started.
If you had told me twenty years ago I would be the co-founder of an app, the prime goal of which was to make the world more active, I would have laughed on two counts. Firstly, the idea of me linked to tech when my kids still laugh at the speed at which I send a text or take a photo and secondly, because being ‘active’ was something I never thought was for me. I have often recounted reasons for my dislike of PE at school: never feeling good enough, the humiliation of hearing a drill instruction and not being able to replicate it, being picked last for sides, feeling uncomfortable in my PE kit, never having the opportunity to experience the comradery of belonging to a team, the list goes on… I decided once and for all it was never going to be ‘my thing.’ How I wish those stories just described my own experience and that of a handful of others in a subject that has long since changed…
This blog is prompted by World Health Day 2022 which comes a day after Annual World Day of Physical Activity. Awareness days allow us an opportunity to reflect on key themes, in this case, Health; in this short piece I would like to explore its relationship with PE. We have also prepared a FREE resource, Top Tips for Supporting your Students’ Health, to help apply some of the points discussed into practice. Click here to receive it.
In 1969 Muska Mosston published his continuum of teaching styles. These equipped PE teachers with 11 distinct styles that supported different learning processes and outcomes. In March 2022, Ofsted published the Research Review into PE in which they clearly prioritise 1 of the 11 teaching styles; Style B, Practice Style. In this blog, I will share some initial reflections. At the bottom you can click through to some questions, which aim to support teachers explore the applications and implications of the Research Review.
The purpose of physical education has long been contested. This is expertly documented and the claims assessed in Bailey et al’s seminal summary paper (2009). However, it could be argued that the purpose is not debated or debatable. If we examine policy documents from around the world and over time, there is actually a very consistent theme – equipping young people with the tools they need to be active and remain active. For a range of complex reasons, physical educators have always justified the existence of the subject by jumping onto other agendas. These agendas are always a reflection of the broader societal and educational priorities. These priorities often take on the guise of commonsense, after all, who wouldn’t want young people to be more resilient? However, if we ask deeper questions such as who produces and prioritises the agenda and why, which young people is it aimed at and who benefits or suffers as a result, the veneer of commonsense soon fades.
Scenario: It’s the first day of the new academic year and you are Head of PE at St Andrew’s High. Two parcels arrive on your desk both containing sports shirts. One is from Harry. Harry left your school last year. You knew him very well. He has sent you the shirt he wore for his Liverpool debut with a note saying ‘THANKS FOR EVERYTHING from ST ANDREW’S FINEST’
To get young people into sport and PA we usually start with ‘why’. However, Jay Coakley, the father of sport sociology suggests that if we want to understand how to set young people up for a lifetime of PA, we should look to, and learn from the experiences of active adults when they were young. However, there’s a paradox here that continues to trip us up and it plays out like this...a young person has positive experiences in sport/PA. This grows into a passion. The passion might lead to pursuing a sport related degree and the most common of these is sport science. Sport science is a common first degree for people who go on to teach PE. Equipped with deep knowledge about the scientific benefits of physical activity the now qualified teacher believes that it is via rational persuasion that an individual will get into the very thing that the teacher is into. This logic is flawed and ignores the emotional attachment that got the teacher into sport/PA in the first place. As such, we lose the soul of our subject. Rationality, objectivity, science does not shape behaviour. Feeling connected to people, places, activities does. So in this blog I’ll explore what we can learn from the behaviour science of habit formation that can help us support students more effectively.